Litigation & Alternative Dispute Resolution
Gammage & Burnham Representing Maricopa County Stadium District
Gammage & Burnham has been hired to represent the Maricopa County Stadium District in connection with its dispute with the Arizona Diamondbacks and the AZPB Limited Partnership. The firm will be joined in this representation by John Williams of Williams Lopatto PLLC of Washington, DC.
Greg Gnepper Successful in Litigation Case
Litigation partner Greg Gnepper recently represented a California company in litigation in Arizona. As part of a dispute over invoices, the defendant had seized a piece of equipment from the client’s premises. Greg sought and obtained a preliminary injunction that prevented the defendant from transferring, encumbering, or even using the equipment. After a full evidentiary hearing, the court sided with our client and determined that the defendant’s position lacked merit. Our client was ecstatic with this decision.
Richard Mahrle Named a Top Mediator in Arizona
We are pleased to announce that firm member Richard Mahrle has been named a top mediator in Arizona by the AZ Business magazine.
Rick’s practice focuses on mediation, arbitration, and litigation where he represents clients in commercial disputes involving construction, business dissolution, corporate governance, and contract enforcement. He also has significant experience regarding employment matters including restrictive employment covenants, defending wrongful termination and discrimination claims, and advising employers on complying with employment laws. Rick does extensive appellate work and has served as a judge pro tem for the Arizona Court of Appeals. He is on the commercial, construction, and employment arbitration panels for the American Arbitration Association.
Legal Alert: Arbitration or Litigation
Kevin Blakley and Greg Gnepper Win Major Commercial Loan Litigation Case
Attorneys Kevin Blakley and Greg Gnepper recently prevailed in hotly contested litigation over a commercial loan. At stake was a post-foreclosure deficiency claim exceeding $5 million. The parties disputed the value of commercial property that served as collateral, and certain defendants also argued that language in the loan documents limited their exposure. After a full trial involving multiple expert witnesses, our client prevailed on all issues—and the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in all respects. The appellate opinion is available at AmT CADC Venture vs. Sun American, 2015 WL 1456668 (Ariz.App. 2015).
Filter By:
- Employment Law
- Newsletter + Legal Alerts
- News
- Practice Areas
- Construction Law
- Water Law
- Public Private Partnerships
- Cannabis Law
- Government Relations & Administrative Law
- Estate Planning
- Creditor’s Rights & Bankruptcy
- Litigation & Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Commercial Lending
- Business Organizations & Commercial Transactions
- Health Care
- Real Estate
- Land Use
- In the Community
- Recognition
- Uncategorized